Questão FC171241
The gathering wreckage of liberalism’s twilight years can be seen all around, especially in America, Mr Deneen’s main focus. The founding tenets of the faith have been shattered. E
Interpretação de Textos (Understanding)
IADES · 2023
OVER the past four centuries liberalism has been so successful that it has driven all its opponents off the battlefield. Now it is disintegrating, destroyed by a mix of hubris and internal contradictions, as professor Patrick Deneen claims in his recently published work Why Liberalism Failed.
The gathering wreckage of liberalism’s twilight years can be seen all around, especially in America, Mr Deneen’s main focus. The founding tenets of the faith have been shattered. Equality of opportunity has produced a new meritocratic aristocracy that has all the aloofness of the old aristocracy with none of its sense of noblesse oblige. Democracy has degenerated into a theatre of the absurd. And technological advances are reducing ever more areas of work into meaningless drudgery. “The gap between liberalism’s claims about itself and the lived reality of the citizenry” is now so wide that “the lie can no longer be accepted,” Mr Deneen writes. What better proof of this than the vision of 1,000 private planes whisking their occupants to Davos to discuss the question of “creating a shared future in a fragmented world”?
Mr Deneen uses the term “liberalism” in its philosophical rather than its popular sense. He is describing the great tradition of political theory that is commonly traced to Thomas Hobbes and John Locke rather than the set of vaguely leftish attitudes that Americans now associate with the word. But this is no work of philosophical cud- chewing. Most political theorists argue that liberalism has divided into two independent streams: classical liberalism, which celebrates the free market, and left-liberalism which celebrates civil rights. For Mr Deneen they have an underlying unity. Most political observers think that the debate about the state of liberalism has nothing to do with them. Mr Deneen argues that liberalism is a ruling philosophy, dictating everything from court decisions to corporate behaviour. Theory is practice.
The underlying unity lies in individual selfexpression. Both classical and left liberals conceive of humans as rights-bearing individuals who should be given as much space as possible to fulfil their dreams. The aim of government is to secure rights. The legitimacy of the system is based on a shared belief in a “social contract” between consenting adults. But this produces a paradox. Because the liberal spirit mechanically destroys inherited customs and local traditions, sometimes in the name of market efficiency and sometimes in the name of individual rights, it creates more room for the expansion of the state, as marketmaker and law-enforcer.
As far as comprehension of the text above is concerned, mark the statements below as right (C) or wrong (E).
From its inception liberalism could never live up to its promise of “creating a shared future in a fragmented world”.
Mostrar resposta e comentário
Gabarito
Errado
Comentário do professor
Comentário: A afirmação está errada porque o texto discute como o liberalismo, embora tenha falhado em cumprir plenamente suas promessas, ainda possui uma base filosófica sólida e uma influência significativa na sociedade. O autor, Patrick Deneen, argumenta que o liberalismo, tanto em suas formas clássica quanto esquerda, é uma filosofia dominante que molda a política e a sociedade contemporânea. A ideia de "criar um futuro compartilhado em um mundo fragmentado" é usada para criticar a hipocrisia do liberalismo, mas não implica que o liberalismo nunca tenha tido a capacidade de realizar essa promessa. Portanto, a afirmação de que o liberalismo nunca poderia viver até suas promessas é uma simplificação incorreta da análise apresentada no texto.
Conteúdo do catálogo FC Concursos · Atualizado em