Questão FC277229
Mechanical engineers develop an “intelligent co-pilot” for cars Semiautonomous system takes the wheel to keep drivers safe. Jennifer Chu, MIT News Office July 13, 2012 Barrels and
Gramática (Grammatics)
IDECAN · 2012
Mechanical engineers develop an “intelligent co-pilot” for cars
Semiautonomous system takes the wheel to keep drivers safe.
Jennifer Chu, MIT News Office
July 13, 2012
Barrels and cones dot an open field in Saline, Mich., forming an obstacle course for a modified vehicle. A driver remotely steers the vehicle through the course from a nearby location as a researcher looks on. Occasionally, the researcher instructs the driver to keep the wheel straight – a trajectory that appears to put the vehicle on a collision course with a barrel. Despite the driver’s actions, the vehicle steers itself around the obstacle, transitioning control back to the driver once the danger has passed.
The key to the maneuver is a new semiautonomous safety system developed by Sterling Anderson, a PhD student in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering, and Karl Lagnemma, a principal research scientist in MIT’s Robotic Mobility Group.
The system uses an onboard camera and laser rangefinder to identify hazards in a vehicle’s environment. The team devised an algorithm to analyze the data and identify safe zones – avoiding, for example, barrels in a field, or other cars on a roadway. The system allows a driver to control the vehicle, only taking the wheel when the driver is about to exit a safe zone.
Anderson, who has been testing the system in Michigan since last September, describes it as an “intelligent co-pilot” that monitors a driver’s performance and makes behind-the-scenes adjustments to keep the vehicle from colliding with obstacles, or within a safe region of the environment, such as a lane or open area.
“The real innovation is enabling the car to share (control) with you,” Anderson says. “If you want to drive, it’ll just… make sure you don’t hit anything.”
The group presented details of the safety system recently at the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium in Spain.
(http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2012/mechanical-engineers-develop-intelligent-car-co-pilot-0713.html – Com adaptações.)
Mark the alternative that presents the correct relation between the fragment and the brackets.
I. “Anderson, who has been testing the system in Michigan since last September, describes it as an ‘intelligent copilot’ that monitors a driver’s performance…” (Anderson)
II. “… the researcher instructs the driver to keep the wheel straight – a trajectory that appears to put the vehicle on a collision course with a barrel.” (trajectory)
III. “Anderson, who has been testing the system in Michigan since last September, describes it as an ‘intelligent copilot’ that monitors a driver’s performance” (co-pilot)
- I, II and III are incorrect.
- Only I and II are correct.
- I, II and III are correct.
- Only II and III are correct.
- Only I and III are correct.
Mostrar resposta e comentário
Gabarito
Certo
Comentário do professor
Who e that estabelecem corretamente a referência aos antecedentes em cada trecho, respeitando o tipo de oração (restritiva ou não) e a natureza do antecedente.
No item I, who refere-se a Anderson, uma pessoa. A oração vem entre vírgulas, sendo não restritiva, e por isso who é a escolha adequada para indicar o autor/testador mencionado.
No item II, that retoma trajectory (trajetória), um substantivo não-pessoal. A oração é restritiva (sem vírgulas), especificando qual trajetória, logo that é apropriado para ligar a oração adjetiva ao antecedente.
No item III, that refere-se a co-pilot, entendido aqui como sistema/entidade que executa ação. A oração também é restritiva, e that concorda em função e número com o antecedente, tornando a referência correta.
Conteúdo do catálogo FC Concursos · Atualizado em