Questão FC478437
Generative Art – What’s real?
Interpretação de Textos (Understanding)
FGV · 2023
Read Text I and answer the three questions that follow it.
Text I
Generative Art – What’s real?
There is nothing new about the concept and creation of ‘artificial intelligence art’ or ‘generative art’. However, discussion of its legal and ethical or societal implications (both intended and unintended) hit the headlines last week.
Boris Eldagsen refused his Sony World Photography Award 2023 prize in the creative open category on the basis that his entry was the product of artificial intelligence. Mr Eldagsen himself has sparked the latest debate by claiming that “AI is not photography” and that the rationale for entering the Awards with the work in question was “…to find out if the competitions are prepared for AI images to enter. They are not”.
The reaction of the World Photography Organisation (running the Sony Awards) has been to acknowledge the need for an element of human involvement, which is the crux of the debate: “While elements of AI practices are relevant in artistic contexts of image-making, the Awards always have been and will continue to be a platform for championing the excellence and skill of photographers and artists working in this medium”.
[…]
The conventional (and long assumed) approach has been to recognise the importance of the human hand to an artwork. The question then is: to what extent is the human creator or inputter the ‘artist’ as opposed to the generative system or is the system merely representing the human creator or inputter’s artistic idea? Flowing from that question is what that might then mean in terms of the ownership and value of such works. The debate looks set to continue in this particular context of imagery creation and reproduction coinciding with the increasing availability and use of consumer-grade AI image generation programmes, and the natural inclination of artists to continue to create.
Adapted from https://www.rosenblatt-law.co.uk/insight/generative-art-whats-real/
In the first paragraph, the relation between the two sentences is one of
- contrast.
- condition.
- correlation.
- consequence.
- concomitance.
Mostrar resposta e comentário
Gabarito
A
Comentário do professor
A relação entre as duas frases do primeiro parágrafo é de contraste. Isso significa que a segunda frase apresenta uma ideia que se opõe ou qualifica a expectativa criada pela primeira.
No texto, a primeira frase afirma que não há novidade no conceito de arte de IA; a segunda informa que, mesmo assim, o assunto virou notícia. Essa oposição entre a ausência de novidade e a repercussão recente caracteriza o contraste.
O conector que marca essa oposição é however, que equivale a no entanto ou não obstante. Conectores como nevertheless, nonetheless e yet também cumprem a mesma função, estabelecendo choque ou reserva entre ideias.
Dica prática: identifique mudança de foco ou expectativa entre sentenças e procure por conectores adversativos para reconhecer relações de contraste.
Conteúdo do catálogo FC Concursos · Atualizado em