FC ConcursosFC Concursos

Questão FC57427

U.S. Finds No Evidence of Alien Technology in Flying Objects, but can’t rule it out, either WASHINGTON — American intelligence officials have found no evidence that aerial phenomen

Interpretação de Textos (Understanding)

CESGRANRIO · 2021

U.S. Finds No Evidence of Alien Technology in Flying Objects, but can’t rule it out, either

WASHINGTON — American intelligence officials have found no evidence that aerial phenomena observed by Navy pilots in recent years are alien spacecraft, but they still cannot explain the unusual movements that have mystified scientists and the military.
The report determines that a vast majority of more than 120 incidents over the past two decades did not originate from any American military or other advanced US government technology, the officials said. That determination would appear to eliminate the possibility that Navy pilots who reported seeing unexplained aircraft might have encountered programs the government meant to keep secret.
But that is about the only conclusive finding in the classified intelligence report, the officials said. And while a forthcoming unclassified version, expected to be released to Congress by June 25, will present few other firm conclusions, senior officials briefed on the intelligence conceded that the very ambiguity of the findings meant the government could not definitively rule out theories that the phenomena observed by military pilots might be alien spacecraft.
Americans’ long-running fascination with UFOs has intensified in recent weeks in anticipation of the release of the government report. Former President Barack Obama encouraged the interest when he gave an interview last month about the incidents on “The Late Late Show with James Corden” on CBS.
“What is true, and I’m really being serious here,” Mr. Obama said, “is that there is film and records of objects in the skies that we don’t know exactly what they are.’’ The report concedes that much about the observed phenomena remains difficult to explain, including their acceleration, as well as ability to change direction and submerge. One possible explanation — that the phenomena could be weather balloons or other research balloons — does not hold up in all cases, the officials said, because of changes in wind speed at the times of some of the interactions.
Many of the more than 120 incidents examined in the report are from Navy personnel, officials said. The report also examined incidents involving foreign militaries over the last two decades. Intelligence officials believe that at least some of the aerial phenomena could have been experimental technology from a rival power, most likely Russia or China.
One senior official said without hesitation that U.S. officials knew it was not American technology. He said there was worry among intelligence and military officials that China or Russia could be experimenting with hypersonic technology.
He and other officials spoke about the classified findings in the report on the condition of anonymity.
Available at: <https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/03/us/politics/
ufos-sighting-alien-spacecraft-pentagon.html>. Retrieved on:
July 7, 2021.
One of the purposes of the text is to confirm that the report determines the
  1. existence of life on other planets
  2. imminent possibility of aliens’ attack
  3. superiority of American technology
  4. authorities’ ignorance about unusual aircraft
  5. danger of enemy nations’ attacks to the US
Mostrar resposta e comentário

Gabarito

D

Comentário do professor

Alternativa correta: A alternativa D está correta porque o texto menciona que, apesar dos esforços dos oficiais de inteligência, eles não conseguiram explicar os movimentos incomuns dos fenômenos aéreos observados, o que demonstra uma certa ignorância ou falta de compreensão das autoridades sobre esses objetos. O relatório admite que ainda há muitos aspectos sobre os fenômenos observados que permanecem difíceis de explicar.


Alternativas incorretas:

A: A alternativa A está incorreta porque o relatório não confirma a existência de vida em outros planetas; ele apenas reconhece a impossibilidade de explicar certos fenômenos observados, sem fazer afirmações sobre vida extraterrestre.


B: A alternativa B é incorreta, pois o texto não menciona a possibilidade iminente de um ataque alienígena. O foco está na falta de evidências e explicações para os fenômenos, não em um ataque.


C: A alternativa C está errada porque o relatório não afirma a superioridade da tecnologia americana. Na verdade, os oficiais afirmam que a maioria dos incidentes não é proveniente de tecnologia militar americana, sugerindo que pode haver outros fatores em jogo.


E: A alternativa E é incorreta, pois embora o texto mencione a possibilidade de que alguns fenômenos possam ser tecnologia experimental de potências rivais, não se trata de um perigo iminente de ataque, mas sim de uma análise sobre os fenômenos observados.

Conteúdo do catálogo FC Concursos · Atualizado em

Continue aprendendo