FC ConcursosFC Concursos

Questão FC699681

In 1985 Kachru described the world of English in terms of three circles. In the inner circle he put countries such as Britain, the USA, Australia, etc., where English is the primar

Gramática (Grammatics)

VUNESP · 2024

In 1985 Kachru described the world of English in terms of three circles. In the inner circle he put countries such as Britain, the USA, Australia, etc., where English is the primary language. The outer circle contained countries where English had become an official or widely-used second language. These included India, Nigeria, Singapore, etc. Finally, the expanding circle represented those countries where English was learnt as a foreign language – countries such as Poland, Japan, Mexico, Hungary, etc.

 

Kachru’s numbers have been dramatically surpassed. But something else has happened, too. It was once assumed that there was some kind of inbuilt superiority for inner circle speakers. They spoke “better” English, and there were more of them. Among other things, this situation ‘bred an extremely enervating inferiority complex among many a non-native speaker learner/teacher’ (Rajagopalan 2004:114). But since English is now used more often as a lingua franca than as a native language – and since the majority of competent English speakers are not native speakers, but second language users – the inner circle has lost much of its linguistic power, real or imagined (though there are still many people who advocate using a native-speaker model to teach international English).

 

As a result, a consensus has emerged that instead of talking about inner, outer and expanding circle Englishes, we need to recognize ‘World Englishes’ (Jenkins 2006:159) or ‘Global English’ (Graddol 2006:106). World English (in Rajagopalan’s words) ‘… belongs to everyone who speaks it, but it is nobody’s mother tongue’ (2004:111). Nobody owns English anymore – perhaps we could say that we all, native and non-native speakers alike, own it together and have, or should have, equal rights as English users.

 

(Harmer (2007) The practice of English Language Teaching. Pp. 17,18)

 

The past tense of regular verbs in English has 3 possible ending pronunciations: /t/, /d/ or /id/. Mark the alternative that contains the verb whose ending is /id/.

  1. Altered.
  2. Explored.
  3. Described.
  4. Used.
  5. Included.
Mostrar resposta e comentário

Gabarito

Errado

Comentário do professor

Included é a resposta correta porque, no passado, a terminação -ed desse verbo é pronunciada como /ɪd/.

Regra prática: verbos regulares cuja forma base termina com o som /t/ ou /d/ adicionam uma sílaba ao formar o passado; o -ed passa a ser pronunciado /ɪd/, tornando a forma passada bisílaba.

No caso de include, a forma base é pronunciada /ɪnˈkluːd/, com final em /d/. Logo, included tem pronúncia /ɪnˈkluːdɪd/ e o som final é /ɪd/, percebido como uma sílaba extra.

Resumo: a presença do som final /d/ na base impõe a pronúncia /ɪd/ no passado, razão pela qual Included é a alternativa correta.

Conteúdo do catálogo FC Concursos · Atualizado em

Continue aprendendo