FC ConcursosFC Concursos

Questão FC699772

Leia o texto, para responder à questão. The disjunction between method as conceptualized by theorists and method as conducted by teachers is the direct consequence of the inherent

Gramática (Grammatics)

VUNESP · 2024

Leia o texto, para responder à questão.

 

The disjunction between method as conceptualized by theorists and method as conducted by teachers is the direct consequence of the inherent limitations of the concept of method itself. First and foremost, methods are based on idealized concepts geared toward idealized contexts. Since language learning and teaching needs, wants, and situations are unpredictably numerous, no idealized method can visualize all the variables in advance in order to provide situation-specific suggestions that practicing teachers need to tackle the challenges they are confronted with every day of their professional lives.

 

Not anchored in any specific learning and teaching context, and caught up in the whirlwind of fashion, methods tend to wildly drift from one theoretical extreme to the other. At one time, grammatical drills were considered the right way to teach; at another, they were given up in favor of communicative tasks. At one time, explicit error correction was not only favored but considered necessary; at another, it was frowned upon. These extreme swings create conditions where certain aspects of learning and teaching get overly emphasized while certain others are utterly ignored, depending on which way the pendulum swings.

 

The limitations of the concept of method gradually led to statements such as “the term method is a label without substance” (Clarke, 1983, p. 109), and that it has “diminished rather than enhanced our understanding of language teaching” (Pennycook, 1989, p. 597). This realization has resulted in a widespread dissatisfaction with the concept of method.

 

(Kumaravadivelu, B. Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for language teaching. Haven and London: Yale University Press. 2003. Adaptado)

 

In the fragment of the first paragraph –... no idealized method can visualize all the variables in advance so as to provide situation-specific suggestions that practicing teachers need so that they can tackle the challenges they are confronted with… –, the terms in bold introduce

  1. a result
  2. a comparison
  3. a purpose
  4. a concession
  5. a cause-and-effect relation
Mostrar resposta e comentário

Gabarito

Certo

Comentário do professor

As locuções em destaque, so as to e so that, introduzem a ideia de finalidade ou propósito. Ambas explicam para que algo é feito, ou seja, o objetivo da ação mencionada no trecho.

so as to funciona como locução adverbial de finalidade e antecede um verbo no infinitivo. He left early so as to catch the bus. (Ele saiu cedo para pegar o ônibus.)

so that é conjunção subordinativa final que introduz uma oração que expressa objetivo. She whispered so that no one could hear her. (Ela sussurrou para que ninguém pudesse ouvi-la.)

No enunciado, ambos indicam o propósito de “fornecer sugestões” e de “permitir que os professores enfrentem desafios”, por isso a alternativa correta é a purpose.

Conteúdo do catálogo FC Concursos · Atualizado em

Continue aprendendo